Queensland's political-media club show their totalitarian nature

THE State Government of Queensland now wants people to register their pocket knives.
They are also using drones to spy on fishermen and farmland.
This same political elite - the ruling Labor Party, the so-called opposition Liberal-National Party and the Courier Mail daily newspaper - deny there's any threat of a totalitarian new world order. 
In his famous book 1984, George Orwell exposed the game of self-delusion by a totalitarian political elite that promoted slogans like “Ignorance is Strength” and “War is Peace”.

Queensland LNP candidate Mick Pattel, the organiser of last year's Convoy of No Confidence rally in Canberra, is quickly learning this game.

Patel wrote on the internet site Just Grounds that after some doubts, he now believed in a conspiracy to install world government was indeed happening through global action on climate change.

That was too much for journalist Patrick Lion of the  Courier Mail and Labor Party figures who believe Mick Pattel is a heretic who should be forced to recant such a belief or face political death.

Then Mick Pattel, in a cowardly backdown to enforced political correctness for his own party, recanted his words and removed his internet comments.

If Patrick Lion, the intrepid journalistic investigator, and his political cohorts simply googled “new world order” they would have found at least 30 published references to people like Gordon Brown (ex British Labour Party PM) advocating and announcing a new world order. 
Hello Patrick, was your internet off line? 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/g20-summit/5097195/G20-summit-Gordon-Brown-announces-new-world-order.html

A “new world order” has also been advocated by Tony Blair, George Bush Senior, US Senator Gary Hart, Mikhail Gorbachev and Nicolas Sarkozy among others.

And far from a conspiracy theory, the so-called new world order or “global governance” is actually being implemented via the G8, G11 and G20 forums; and yes, through the global carbon conferences as exposed by Lord Monckton; through the Agenda 21 program where people are being concentrated in “human habitat zones” and through the regional “free trade” agreements where multinational giants totally dominate the economic agenda.

Yes indeed, it’s a totalitarian new world order as now openly warned against by Bob Katter. Wake up Queenslanders! http://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/story/2011/12/19/worse-nanny-state-katter/
Unless Katter's Australian Party and other non-mainstream political candidates can gain a majority of seats in the single-house Queensland State Parliament, this political tyranny will grow and flourish no matter which major party wins the next election.

AFL now run by politically correct, corporate sissy socialists

IT would be unfair to call the Gold Coast Suns player who reported Western Bulldogs player Justin Sherman for making a "racist comment" a sissy. He was probably just following 'official policy' about what to do when someone makes a racist snipe in the heat of the game.

The 19-year-old Gold Coast Suns rookie suspected of making the complaint against Sherman probably wouldn't understand the political, philosophical or ethical matters behind this issue, but the AFL corporate chiefs who shamed Justin Sherman into a communist-style public confession of his "crime" have got no excuse for being gutless, cowardly sissies and turning the game into an exercise in socialist political correctness. 

First of all the AFL makes a big show of the silly female Muslim AFL playing gear. Do they seriously expect AFL-playing girls to go running around in those head dresses? The girls wearing those garments will be at a distinct disadvantage to the non-Muslim players. What happens when one of them gets torn off in a tussle? Will the offending player also be subject to a racial vilification charge? Perhaps the AFL corporate crowd will fix the problem by making them compulsory for all females in the name of "equal opportunity" and "diversity"? Sounds like the AFL's new style.

But underlying the public shaming of Sherman and the parade of female Muslim AFL gear is an old political and social engineering agenda. Forcing someone to publicly confess to 'racial vilification' and attend an 'education course' is straight out of the communist text books i.e. public humiliation(i) for thought crimes and re-education camps. The EU is notorious for this Marxist-style "law" and apparently, we must fall into line like good little globalists.

But the prosecution of these so-called 'racial vilification' crimes on the sports field are also double standards and hypocrisy. It seems you can call another player any name you want or spit any insult in his face, but don't mention skin colour. Oh no, that's the cardinal sin, apparently. No doubt references to "sexual orientation" would be similarly treated.

The AFL corporate chiefs are turning the players into sissies. Any player offended by a comment about skin colour should shirtfront the other player and show some guts. But Bulldogs CEO Simon Garlick sums up the incident with the following cowardly, grovelling, astounding example of political correctness: “The Western Bulldogs not only embrace and celebrate diversity we are proud and active champions for tolerance and social inclusion in our community.” What a load of bollocks! 

Similar cowardly drivel was expressed by AFL football operations manager Adrian Anderson, quoted by the Courier Mail: “It does beggar belief that a player in this day and age could racially vilify an opponent and I hope to never see it again,” he said.“I'm confident our players, and they get educated on this every year, our players understand there is no place for this in our game and this is a complete aberration.” But of course commissar! 
Who says the Western Bulldogs are "active champions" for "tolerance and social inclusion". 

Well, Mr Garlick, if that's that case, how about your Bulldog boys join in the next Sydney Mardis Gras? Perhaps the Bulldogs could have a special "Hug a Gay Day"? What better way to "embrace and celebrate diversity"? Perhaps the Swans should change their colours to pink in support of Sydney's "diverse" gay community? But seriously Mr Garlick, are the Bulldogs football players or are they social activists? Wake up AFL corporate bosses! You seem to have been under the spell of the Victorian Labor Party for too long. Or have you been spending too much time with the Australian Institute of Company Directors - those other corporate champions of the socialist agenda?

(i) From Reading guide for Son of the Revolution: These chapters describe Liang Heng's childhood and the enormous stress he was placed under when his mother was arbitrarily labeled a "Rightist" (a right-wing anti-communist) after the 100 Flowers Campaign of 1957 and forced to undergo public humiliation.

Open Letter to Queensland MPs & Treasury on debt bondage

Gold Coast MPs,

The Premier, The Treasurer,

Under Treasurer and Under Secretary Gerard Bradley.

Dear Premier, Treasurer, MPs and Mr Bradley:

As explained by my friend Len Clampett in the attached letter to Treasurer Andrew Fraser, State Governments that take on ever-increasing, exponential private debt are not fulfilling their Constitutional duty of care and neither are they promoting the “peace, welfare and good government of the State”.

Tell me Liberal-National Party MPs, will you be proud to be presiding over police state-enforced austerity as demanded by the IMF and the like? Already people commonly refer to police as “revenue raisers”. Do our police need to wear that? But please tell me how it is lawful for police to randomly stop people without reasonable cause or suspicion and extract revenue for mostly minor infringements? Even worse, state and council environmental officers everywhere are unlawfully demanding oppressive fees and charges and imposing unconstitutional restrictions on trade and lawful use of private property – this is nothing but corporate state fascism.

Len says in the attached: “The Queensland State Constitution, and even the fraudulent Queensland Constitution of 2001 … clearly lays down that the Parliament is charged with the Duty-of-Care of all Queenslanders and those who reside here, even temporarily, in that the Assembly has the POWER to make laws for the peace, WELFARE and good government of the State. I suppose it does need to be explained to you that when a Cabinet sits in secret and plots ways to defraud The People it is a true conspiracy and not just a theory. It should not be necessary to explain to you that it is not in the best interests of the WELFARE of The People to knowingly, willingly and forcefully keep them in ever increasing exponential debt.”

I would remind you MPs that Acts of Parliament that force people into debt bondage and slavery are unlawful under 270.1  Commonwealth Criminal Code Act, where the term ‘slavery’ is defined as “the condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised, including where such a condition results from a debt or contract made by the person”.

Don’t think MPs that we are somehow immune from economic crisis. The financial powers that be, ie the international banking fraternity and their global business associates (who meet annually as the Bilderberg Group), are ruthlessly committed to the overthrow of sovereign nation states and states within states such as Queensland. It’s called “globalisation”, which is nothing more than a global power grab by an economic elite.

The private international banking cartel (gang would be more appropriate) as represented by the IMF believe only they have the privilege of creating debt ie money, finance, lines of credit. However, the highest law of Australia, the Commonwealth Constitution Section 51 (xiii) makes it very clear that our Commonwealth and States have distinct banking powers ie powers for the state to act as a bank.

Please tell me any of you, including Treasury officers, why are these powers not exercised? There has been no referendum to remove or alter Section 51 (xiii) in regard to banking. Here is an extract of the relevant sections of the Commonwealth Constitution:

51  Legislative powers of the Parliament [see Notes 10 and 11]

                   The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:

(xiii)                   banking, other than State banking; also State banking extending beyond the limits of the State concerned, the incorporation of banks, and the issue of paper money.

The LNP believe Campbell Newman will lead them to an Obama-style “glorious sweep to power” but mark my words, what will change? I would suggest little or nothing except the LNP will exercise more militant “fiscal conservatism” as demanded by the international banksters who will in turn take control of any remaining state assets and then demand yet more revenue via tollways and other user-pays infrastructure.  Infrastructure Australia, of which Campbell Newman is a member, already has it mapped out.

Please tell me Jann Stuckey, John Paul Langbroek, Ray Stevens, Ros Bates, Alex Douglas where I’m wrong in making such a prediction. Len Clampett is stating the painful truth that you don’t have any answers in your policy. Debt will get worse and taxes and regulations will remain just as burdensome, if not more so, than under Anna Bligh, unless you are prepared to stand up and do what is lawful and right for the people of Queensland and the Commonwealth.

Regards,

Brent Melville

172 Ron Penhaligon Way,

Robina,

Queensland 4226.

Half-baked theology and Zionism drives Christian prophecy industry

"And going out, Jesus left the temple. And His disciples came to show Him the buildings of the temple. But Jesus said to them, Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, There will not at all be left one stone on a stone which in no way will not be thrown down." Gospel of Matthew 24: 1-2

"Truly I say to you, In no way will this generation pass away until all these things have occurred." Gospel of Matthew 24:34 
"Zionism: 1. a movement for (originally) the re-establishment and (now) the development and protection of a Jewish nation in what is now Israel. It was established as a political organization in 1897 under Theodor Herzl, and was later led by Chaim Weizmann." - Oxford Dictionaries  
 
THE New Testament verses above are part of a famous discourse by Jesus, foretelling the "end of the age" and the overthrow and destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in AD70. History, written primarily by Josephus, records that the massive stones  of the temple were indeed thrown and down moved out of their place as the Romans desperately dug for the temple gold that had melted down between the stones as the temple timbers and fittings burned fiercely. The Jerusalem temple, the symbol of ancient Israel and the Old Covenant, was demolished within the lifespan of those around Jesus at the time of his prophecy. The prophecy had been literally fulfilled 40 years after Jesus spoke it.
Fast forward to the late 1700s and 1800s and a new doctrine had a different view. It came to be known as dispensationalism and speculated that the "real fulfilment" of Jesus' prophecy was yet to take place. Theologians, mystics and sects such as the Plymouth Brethren began to bring a new twist on the verses of Matthew 24 and other prophecies. John Nelson Darby, Cyrus Scofield and others who advanced this belief, said God had a special, separate, unfulfilled purpose for "the Jews". This flew in the face of St Paul's New Testament teaching that Christ had united Jew and Gentile spiritually. St Paul, the converted Pharisee, taught that the biblical Hebrews, the Judeans (translated "Jews" in modern English) and the other 11 tribes who looked forward to the fulfilment of their religion in the prophesied Messiah, could now share their revealed Messiah Jesus with the Gentiles (non-Hebrews). St Paul was called the Apostle to the Gentiles and his mission, as shown in his letters to the Romans and the Greeks at Ephesus, Corinth and Thessalonica, was to reveal the good news, the gospel, to these Gentile nations.
But towards the end of the 19th Century, the system of theology called dispensationalism put a strange twist on all of this.  It taught, for instance, that "this generation" of Matthew 24:34, was not the people who Jesus was actually talking to, but a future "regathered, remnant Israel" who would fulfil prophesies of the Old Testament some 2000 years or so from their actual, biblical fulfilment in Jesus Christ. St Paul himself wrote that all the promises of God i.e. the promises of the Old Testament, are "yes and amen" in Jesus Christ.
However, nearly 40 years after Cyrus I. Scofield published his first dispensationalist Scofield Reference Bible in 1909 and 1878 years after the destruction of Jerusalem temple, modern Israel was formed in 1948. This event was (and still is) taken by the growing numbers of dispensationalists in the fundamentalist churches and sects such as the Jehovah's Witnesses, as God's work, a literal fulfilment of Old Testament prophecy. 
But did the God of the Old and New testaments predetermine that Palestinians and Jews should engage in decades of almost ceaseless bloodletting and violence over the land taken by the new settlers from Russia and Eastern Europe under the Palestinian Mandate of the United Nations? Many of these new "Jewish" settlers were fair-skinned, non-Semitic Russian and Eastern Europeans, who claimed their Judaic religion entitled them to occupy the "Holy Land" - despite the fact that the Palestinians (and Jews) already lawfully occupied the region and had lived together in relative harmony in the region until 1948 under Turkish and then British rule. 

Zionist takes Scofield under his wing
This idea of "Bible prophecy yet to be fulfilled" was gaining momentum in the late 1800s and early 1900s as the Jewish Zionist movement, led by Theodore Herzl and backed by the powerful Rothschild banking family and others, began to agitate for a "Jewish Homeland". The fact that this campaign coincided with the rise of dispensationalist theology may not actually be coincidental. At least one very significant connection

between the Jewish Zionists and the Christian dispensationalists was that of Cyrus Scofield and Samuel Untermeyer, the wealthy Jewish New York City Attorney and political wheeler-dealer.
Scofield was an American lawyer who became Kansas Attorney in curious circumstances. He apparently converted to Christianity after abandoning his family and being convicted of fraud that landed him in jail.  According to some researchers including his foremost critic Joseph Canfield, Scofield never studied law but was admitted to the bar by a secretive group of financiers from Boston known as "the Boston Six". He became a leading advocate for dispensationalism in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
After his release from jail and conversion Scofield ran a small church in Texas and was later given leave to go overseas and pursue his studies of earlier dispensationalist work. In New York he somehow connected with Untermeyer, perhaps through his law connections. Apart from becoming New York City Attorney, Untermeyer also became president of the World Jewish Economic Federation. He and Scofield attended The Lotos Club, the "place to be" for well-connected journalists, writers, artists and anyone who was anybody. It is curious that a nationally prominent Jewish lawyer, or even the club he attended, would open its doors to a convicted and shamed fraudster turned pastor of a fundamentalist church.
 Although unstated in Scofield's biographies, it is suspected that this connection opened the door to Scofield's stunning success in getting his "marginal notes" (i.e. dispensationalistScofield Reference Bible. Scofield's study notes in the margins of the King James Bible became standard text for many evangelical seminaries across the United States of America and remain so to this day.
The rise of dispensationalism continued through the 1960s, fueled by the Six-Day War of 1967 between Egypt, Syria and Israel, and the best-seller book The Late Great Planet Earth by dispensationalist Hal Lindsey. Lindsey and others like him confidently predicted a "rapture" - a supernatural catching up by God of the worldwide church into Heaven - the onset of a seven-year "Great Tribulation" centered on Jerusalem followed by a "the Second Coming  of Christ". All of this, apparently, was to happen by about the year 2000 - and of course it didn't. Nevertheless, this hasn't stopped the promotion of the multi-million-dollar dispensationalist Left Behind series of books and videos that declare: "God isn't finished with the Jews!" "Jerusalem will be surrounded by armies and destroyed! It's the end times! The last days!" Such hysteria totally ignores, or is ignorant of, the facts of the literal, historical fulfilment of the prophecies by Jesus and the early church. This topic can be studied in depth at the website The Preterist Archive.


Zionist politics and fallacious dispensationalist arguments 
 What I have discovered is that Christians who doctrinally buy into a pro-Israel position become partisan and emotionally attached to that position. US televangelist John Hagee and the peddlers of the Left Behind books and films have even become paid agents of the US Jewish Zionist political lobby, running lavish, multi-million dollar fundraisers to promote the Jewish Zionist cause and running multi-million dollar "Holy Land" tourism operations. And then there's the lobbying of US politicians side by side with groups such as the America-Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC) to support Israel with billions of dollars worth of military aid annually to the point now where Israel is ranked as the fifth military power in the world - astounding for such a small nation. 
The favourite scripture of the Christian dispensationalists allegedly justify this unconditional support for Israel is Genesis 12:3 where God says to Abraham "I will bless those that bless you and curse those who curse you".
According to their theory America should be the most blessed nation on earth, because of all the military aid they have given to Israel. 
They forget that the God of the Bible never was partisan, even towards ancient Israel. Israel suffered under God's judgment whenever it strayed from His laws, commands and principles. Yes, the scriptures tell us God did love the ancient Hebrew people who he chose to carry his law and to prophesy of the coming Messiah. But the objective in God's heart was the establishment of "Abraham and his seed", that is, people of faith from every tribe and nation. St Paul repeatedly teaches that "Abraham's children" are people of faith, that is, believers in Christ, hearers of the Spirit of God and doers of His will.
Jews and Gentiles become one
The Old Testament Psalms teach that the foundation of God's throne is truth and justice. The Christian doctrine is based on the historic, spiritual fact of reconciliation between Jew and Gentile (Ephesians 2:14) not separation. When Christian dispensationalists say “the Jews are God’s chosen people today" they contradict the scripture and create all sorts of problems. For instance, St Paul wrote in  Romans 2: “Who is a Jew … a Jew is one inwardly, not of circumcision”. What is he saying there? He goes on to say a "true Jew" is someone with a "circumcised heart", that is, someone who is repentant and humble, not proud - a person of faith. So how can dispensationalists insist people are “true Jews” merely based upon their being born into the religion of Judaism, whose ultimate authority is the Talmud? 

St Paul also wrote in the famous passage of Romans 10 that there is "no distinction" and "whosoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved".  Note those words Christians: No distinction. Jesus said as much to the Pharisees who proudly stated "We are Abraham's children" to which Jesus caustically replied "If you were Abraham's children you would do the works of Abraham". He underlined the point by saying: "You are of your father the devil!" What was Jesus saying? Faith and deeds is what counts, not lineage.

So why do the dispensationalist Christians still insist on making a distinction between "Jews" and other people? St Paul teaches again in Galatians  that “there is neither Jew nor Greek … all are one in Christ.” Again, why do they make a distinction? Why do they say the Jews have been ordained by God to go through some speculative, prophetic scenario before they can be saved?

The dispensationalists are forced to employ very fancy footwork when confronted with the New Testament Epistle to the Hebrews. Hebrews 8:8 says: “For finding fault, He said to them, "Behold, days are coming, says the Lord, and I will make an end on the house of Israel and on the house of Judah; a new covenant shall be.” God made an end to the Israel and Judah of the Old Testament and gave them a new covenant. When did that happen? It happened at the cross of Calvary. It also happened at the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in AD70. Why do the dispensationalists keep insisting that the Old Covenant still applies to these modern-day people called Jews, that is, the followers of the religion of Judaism? 
Dispensationalists then seize upon chapter 11 of Romans to justify their position, where St Paul notes that God has definitely not forsaken his "Jewish" (more accurately Hebrew) people. St Paul gives honour to the Hebrews for carrying the Ark of God and the scriptures. He also warns the Christians of the day not to be arrogant about their new faith that they share with the believing Hebrews and that they are grafted in as wild olive shoots to "the main olive tree" which is Israel's long journey that culminated in Christ.  In Christ, Israel now becomes a spiritual company of people from all nations, the seed of Abraham.

Modern Israelis are a diverse people
The fact of the matter is, when we look at modern-day Israeli society, we see a relatively diverse people, despite the fact it is a "Jewish state". In terms of religion, Israelis are Jewish, Christian, Muslim and everything else between. The Israelis like to make the  point that they are more diverse than their Muslim neighbours. It's a debatable issue but illustrates that attempts by Christian dispensationalists to paint Israelis as some sort of biblical Israel revived are ludicrous. There many Jews who consider themselves secular, with no religious beliefs. There is an ongoing power struggle between secular and religious Israelis. The tragedy of modern Israel is that the nation-state of Israel was built upon the theft of Palestinian land and of division between Jew and Palestinian, which today manifests in a high concrete wall that encircles the Palestinians in a virtual open prison. How ironic is this wall when the epistle written by St Paul said the "wall of division" or "partition" between Jew and Gentile has been broken down by Jesus Christ? The only land lawfully owned by the Zionist settlers was that which was lawfully purchased from its previous owners. To suggest that the God of the Bible had somehow "ordained" the theft of land from Palestinians and 60 years of bloodshed for the supposed cause of restoring the biblical nation of Israel is foolishness at best and blasphemy at worst.

UK Con-servatives employ "psycho-strategist" to "reframe" Britons

“The danger is that we are to be trained to believe what our politicians and public sector - The State - says is right. And we will not even be aware that we have been ‘reframed’ to think so.”

SO-called British conservative politicians want to “alter the behaviour of people" – or as they like to say now, “reframe" them, make them happy to pay more taxes and other things that social engineers of the state think people should do.
To help them do this, they've hired Frenchman, Olivier Oullier, from the Centre for Strategic Analysis. They’re all into “strategies” these days, aren’t they? It's the mark of some sort of Korporate Kulture of Konformity.
Does this mean that David Cameron's Conservative Party have turned neo-Marxist? Sort of. It's really global corporate culture they are following. They're employing the tools of the global corporations who literally brainwash hundreds of millions of people into accepting their mega brands, for example, Coke, Mars, Nike, Intel, Microsoft, KFC, BP and on and on it goes.
Both the French and UK "conservatives" will undoubtedly be paying the French psycho-strategist big money (I don't know exactly how much, but I can guarantee it's a large consultancy fee) compliments of the taxpayers upon whom they want this strategist to do his sneaky work. The question is, how many of his ilk have been used by Australian state and federal governments? Think of any government campaign and you'll see how our bureaucrats are playing us for fools.
A prime example would be Queensland “The Smart State” of Australia, that has been big on green propaganda campaigns and puts its corporate logo/brand on just about 95 percent of all visible signage in the state. "Smart State", for instance, is a  code word or brand name if you like, for Agenda 21, the UN program to brainwash people into an environmentalist society where the state and big corporations run and own everything. The USA has some "Smart States" also. Queensland's Watch Every Drop campaign, for instance, told us our water was in danger of running out … which opened the door to multinational water companies such as Veolia to come in an take over our Queensland-owned infrastructure. They even tried to sell the idea of the public drinking "purified water" derived from recycled sewage. Meanwhile, back in the UK, here’s what some British freedom fighters from the website, The UK Column, say about our French technocrat:

“British cabinet office collaborates with French brainwashing guru
to change the way we think” 

"On 3 January 2011, following the UK Column's lead article exposing insider dealing between the Cabinet office and political behavioural training charity Common Purpose, The Independent newspaper revealed that David Cameron had also set up a Cabinet Office Behavioural Insight Team. Formed in July last year, the secretive cell is tasked to "dream up psychological tricks to alter our behaviour" - and on a massive scale.

The Independent article warned how the public is to be reframed or “nudged” into politically acceptable "Social Norms"; starting with healthy eating, voluntary work and tax gathering. While this may seem innocent to some people, these early ‘soft’ targets are already being greatly expanded to include wider central government ideological and political agendas, including Cameron's socialist straitjacket of the Big Society. Elite multi-millionaire Socialist and Tory Chancellor George Osborne has already signed up to Behavioural Economics - another form of mental reframing of individuals and groups, specifically to achieve political economic objectives. Their theory and intent is, that once mentally retrained, we “willingly rush to pay excessive taxes”.

The danger is that we are to be trained to believe what our politicians and public sector - The State - says is right. And we will not even be aware that we have been ‘reframed’ to think so. Never mind the basics - politicians have been proved corrupt, deviant, liars - the Soviet Union would have paid in blood and gold for Cameron’s political mind-control initiative to lock people in a hive mind.

Research by the UK Column now exposes that Cameron’s Lib Con government is collaborating behind closed doors with similar sinister units in the French Government, to develop further plans and techniques to change our natural behaviour. Our investigation of little known Rosie Donachie, who is part of the Behavioural Insight Team under Maude, Gus O’Donnell and David Halpern, reveals that Donachie is a key player and go-between in the mental attack on the British public.

Aside from her position as Senior Advisor with the Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team, she is also a Trustee of the Franco-British Council, and is involved with the Party of European Socialists based in Brussels. Not surprisingly for her murky role, she even has two names, being referred to as Rosalin in her Franco-British guise. Tracking Mrs Donachie’s path led UK Column investigative reporters to discover that on 17 November 2010, the Franco British Council had hosted a meeting inside 10 Downing Street attended by a mix of the Cabinet Behavioural Team and their French counterparts.

Alongside Donachie and others, a key attendee at the secretive meeting was top French mind-bender Professor Olivier Oullier, who works directly within French President’s Sarkozy Private Office. The meeting was instigated by Rohan Silva of the No10 Policy Unit following consultation with the Centre for Strategic Analysis of the Prime Minister of France with the aims of: “bringing together experts on behavioral Economics from France and the UK and to seek cross fertilization and generation of concrete proposals through open discussion”, and “to look at practical applications for the science of Behavioural Economics in France and the UK in light of the economic crisis.” Rohan Silva is Senior Policy Advisor to David Cameron and he also sits on the Advisory for progressive Conservatism at DEMOS (a Marxist leaning think tank).

There is, no doubt, an inclination to laugh at the idea that we can be mentally ‘reframed’ or ‘reprogrammed’ into new belief systems and patterns of behaviour. But clearly these people have not been assembled behind closed doors to play games. A simple click on Google will reveal thousands of NLP training organisations, leadership trainers and consultancies. They all state that they can and do change people’s minds. They earn money from doing so. Moreover, whilst NLP and other mental reframing techniques can be used for therapeutic purposes, any technique interfering with the human mind has risks. These may manifest as adverse personality changes, stress or depression.

Stating that: “behavioural economics can be a powerful tool for improving lives when used with care”, the No10 meeting was clearly aware of risks to individuals and the wider public, but according to the notes of the meeting released, seemingly failed to discuss or document those risks.

The truth of the meeting at No 10 is deeply sinister. Modern behavioural manipulation techniques, which includes NLP, can and do, achieve changes in people's behaviour, particularly where the victim, individual or group, adult or child, is unaware that they are being targeted. It is perfectly feasible, as the attendees of No10 are fully aware, to implement political agendas and doctrine by reprogramming people. Consider Hitler Youth, or the Communist Chinese onslaught on the minds of children and young people. These latest insidious techniques, do not have that raw brutality, but unchecked, their stealth, effectiveness, and viral spread presents a far greater danger. Behavioural reframing for health, voluntary work and taxes today - and eugenics tomorrow. We have been warned."

Terrorism, airport searches and the totalitarian nature of globalisation

“As with prominent mummy blogger Erin Chase, whose screening incident at a US airport made international headlines, the woman did not tell me she was going to touch my vagina or feel the inside of my thighs. I was shocked.” Journalist with titanium hip implants recounts her experience at Gold Coast Airport.

 “A retired special education teacher on his way to a wedding in Orlando, Fla., said he was left humiliated, crying and covered with his own urine after an enhanced pat-down by TSA officers recently at Detroit Metropolitan Airport. “I was absolutely humiliated, I couldn’t even speak.” MSNBC news report.

“As the TSA agent was frisking plaintiff, the agent pulled the plaintiff’s blouse completely down, exposing plaintiffs’ breasts to everyone in the area,” the lawsuit said. – News report, The Australian

“The TSA is part of a larger effort to implement a slow motion surveillance and high-tech police state control grid in America.” Kurt Nimmo, infowars.com.

“The 911 Commission was a lie from the top to the bottom.” Michael Scheuer, former head of the CIA’s Bin Laden Unit, to Judge Napolitano, host of “Freedom Watch”, Fox News Channel (with interview of Lt Col Anthony Shaffer).

 “The FBI has not only ignored Haskell’s story, but they have launched a cover-up by refusing to even acknowledge the existence of another man who filmed the entire flight, including the aborted attack, as well as the well-dressed man who aided the bomber to board the plane even though he had no passport and was on a terror watch list.” Kurt Nimmo, infowars.com report on the cover-up of eyewitness accounts of the so-called Underpants Bomber incident.

The bizarre picture of "global security and diversity".

THE original article under the heading "Terrorism, airport searches and the totalitarian nature of globalisation" was emailed to members of the Australian Christian Lobby. I put it to them that the “big picture” presented here has been neglected by too many Christian activists or dismissed as mere conspiracy theory. As a result, their attention has been diverted from the source of the problem. "How many German Christians in the 1930s foresaw the nature of that which was coming upon their country?" I asked. "I think and hope we can learn from history."

Some say the family is the crucial issue for the nation. That is largely true, but politics affects the family and the overarching political agenda facing Australia today is the phenomenon called globalization, whose aim is “global governance”. This is the big political picture that encapsulates most of the social/political issues that we as Christian activists are concerned about. Most, if not all government “reform” policy in Australia is related to the process of globalisation being implemented via the numerous UN treaties and more recently the agendas of the G8, G11, G20, NATO and related conferences that our politicians spend increasing amounts of time attending. The covert imposition of UN jurisdiction in Australia is why several Christian activists have recently charged Australian public figures with treason.

Globalisation in itself is morally neutral, but the globalisation that is being gradually enforced is not a benign process either by design or the desperation of those who seek to impose it. As stated by Aldous Huxley his 1962 lecture at Berkley Campus, the powers that be are now able to stage “the ultimate revolution” through various techniques of social engineering including terrorism: “… the techniques of terrorism have been known since time immemorial … it’s exceedingly difficult to see how pure terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly long time, but sooner or later you have to bring in an element of persuasion, of getting people to consent to what is happening to them. It seems to me the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: That we are in the process of developing a whole series of techniques, which will enable the controlling oligarchy … to get people to love their servitude... a number of techniques about which I talked (in Brave New World) seem to be here already.  This is the ultimate in malevolent revolution, shall we say ... I mean, what might happen if these fantastically powerful techniques were used by unscrupulous people in authority.”

So shat does Huxley mean by “techniques”? Clearly means social engineering by persuasion. Abortion, feminism, euthanasia, free love, gay marriage, gay rights, embryo farming, anti-vilification, decriminalized prostitution, etc, etc are all the results of propaganda and persuasion in a process of overthrowing social norms and imposing a global, secular, socialist and fascist (corporatist) system based on United Nations jurisdiction. But if Huxley and others maintain that terrorism has historically been used in social engineering, who is really behind the terrorism of today?

Given that this idea of a “new world order” has long been the vision of various totalitarian, utopian and even occultic groups, should we be surprised that part of its modus operandi is terrorism. Of course, conspiracy theories abound around this knowledge, including various “biblical end times” scenarios that I don’t subscribe to. What I do know is that we are in the middle of a revolution that sound very much like the one Huxley wrote about in Brave New World in 1931 and that later warned about in the early 60s. Professor Carroll Quigley wrote favourably of the globalist scheme in Tragedy and Hope. Thanks to the internet, we can hear for ourselves what Huxley and Quigley were saying.

Today we also have a global “environ-mental” revolution, based upon the UN Agenda 21 program that came in on the heels of the 1960s hippie revolution. Various researchers have shown environmentalism to be a continuation of the eugenics movement going back to the late 19^th century. Agenda 21 is essentially about the imposition of “global governance”, deemed necessary to “save the planet” from the “global threat” of “climate change”, “global warming”, “species extinction” and so on. This psychological terrorism has been thrown at us incessantly since the 1970s – the so-called threat of ecological collapse. I guess our Creator never factored in the effects of carbon dioxide on His creation (excuse the sarcasm). On this front we see the erosion of private property rights under “environmental law” and the elevation of nature equal to or even above human life. Population control/environmentalism/eugenics for some in the West now is “justification” for one-child families. We breath out carbon dioxide. Should humans be criminalized? Many environmentalists say our numbers should be reduced. By extermination? Yes, some like the distinguished Professor Eric Pianka of the University of Texas believes so. Perhaps I’m being a little unfair on “globalisation”, but it does not look pretty from other angles.

The War on Terror

Another front of globalisation, and the one I draw your urgent attention to, is the so-called War on Terror. We have heard of the War on Drugs and War on Cancer, but this “war” is where the violent, revolutionary side of this current globalisation trend is very clearly revealed to those who have done the research. This is the area where your world view may be seriously challenged. While the threat of Islamic extremism is real, please do not be so naïve to think that terrorism is not practiced by the West. Nevertheless, the threat of Islamic extremism has been (i) deliberately transported into the West by the globalisation policies of mass migration and multiculturalism and (ii) cultivated by western intelligence agencies and used as the bogeyman to blame for almost every act of terrorism. If you’re not up with what really happened on 9-11, for instance, I can only advise you to spend some time looking at the work of people such as Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. http://www.ae911truth.org/ This may shake your world view, but don’t just react, analyze and ask the questions that must be asked.

As highlighted above, there has recently been uproar in the US over “enhanced pat downs” and frequent harassment, assaults and humiliation of people going through airport security checks. There is also the issue of people being forced to take “virtual strip searches” via naked body scanners. Of course, this is all about the “War on Terror”. Apparently we are supposed to be living in constant fear of being bombed, assassinated or hijacked and for this reason we should give up our historic rights and freedoms and subject ourselves to humiliation at the open-palmed hands of government officers who are in fact supposed to be our “public servants”. What they are now doing to airline passengers could easily be deemed sexual assault or at best, inappropriate touching.

The question must be asked then, is the terrorism we hear about so often actually being used by the revolutionary, globalist forces to take away our traditional rights and freedoms? Well, if Michael Scheuer, the former CIA officer in charge of investigating Osama Bin Laden can call the 911 Commission “a lie from top to bottom” we have a problem. Do you think a CIA employee in such a position might be qualified to make such a claim? But it’s not only Scheuer who has uncovered massive inconsistencies, lies and cover-ups in relation to recent terrorism events such as 911. It has also been the case with the London Tube bombings, the Mumbai attacks and pre-911 acts such as the Oklahoma City bombing. And what do we do with the former head of the US Army War College Alan Sabrosky Ph.D, who insists 911 was “a Mossad operation”. Shocking? Not if you know some of the history of Mossad. Sabrosky’s claims can be found here http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/03/19/22329/ They are apparently now well known among US military personnel.

If you’re offended by this, I’m sorry. The truth can hurt. Yes, those who have conducted the research, such as Scheuer and Sabrosky, are clearly saying that “our side does terrorism”. If Huxley or these people do not convince you on this, then please google Operation Northwoods, or Operation Gladio, or Operation Ajax. Senator Roger Lallemand, head of the Belgian Parliamentary Inquiry into Gladio stated: “In the 1980s a type of media terrorism developed here, which used the media to shock the public and political circles. The terrorism could have two sources, the extreme Left or Right. Or it could be foreign governments and foreign intelligence services. It is a terrorism which aims to destablize democratic society.”

The charge is being made, with voluminous current and historical evidence, that what we are seeing at airports is a “beta test” of an actual program to impose martial law in America and generally speaking, where America goes, we go too. The airport-style screenings have already been used at a bus station in the US. According to online journalist Alex Jones hundreds of mobile “public screening vehicles” are to be put in place in the US. Will this happen here? We already see police using roadblocks and taking internal swabs – all for our safety of course. Should we be asking ourselves what sort of “democracy” are we defending in the Middle East? Are we in fact on the verge of becoming “corporatist” or fascist states? Are we already corporatist states? Some significant research suggests we in the West already are. So what’s next? More terrorism? Bioterrorism? A climate crisis?

I think it’s time for Christians to wake up to and at least question this policy of globalization and “global governance”. I would also ask that ACL put this issue on the agenda and start asking questions of our representatives. What is being signed at the G-20 meetings? Does anyone know? Who authorized our PM to sign documents put together by foreign powers? What exactly is the plan for Australia under Agenda 21? Is private property destined for extinction? Are our traditional freedoms and rights to be extinguished.

Perhaps we should heed the advice of Ben Franklin: “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759. I think it’s time to “blow a trumpet in Zion” and “sound an alarm” on His holy mountain. I would welcome any questions, suggestions, corrections or objections – anything but silence.

Australian capitalist elite grovel to Marxist ideology

MARXIST-inspired feminism, the butt of many a joke and TV comedy send up for the past couple of decades, seemed to be dying a natural death. But feminism is not only back in fashion, it is, ironically, being actively enforced by Australia’s “corporate/capitalist elite”. A case in point is the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD).

The AICD has ramped up its "gender diversity" program, with its chairman, Rick Lee, seemingly distressed after a survey by the AICD found there were too few women CEOs and "female chairs" in the top 200 Australian companies. But it's not only the AIDC that has jumped on the bandwagon of global political correctness, so has the Business Council of Australia, the Australian Stock Exchange and BHP Billiton.

One would think that Rick Lee, the chairman of Salmat and a non-executive director of Newcrest Mining, would know something about old fashioned free enterprise and entrepreneurialism. No, it seems Mr Lee prefers the role of politically correct bureaucrat to that of hard-knuckled entrepreneur. His role seems barely distinguishable from the bureaucrats who run government departments and enforce, as a matter of policy, the UN global "diversity/biodiversity" agenda.

On ABC Radio National with Fran Kelly on October 6th, Lee was confronted with his own apparently distressing statistics, gathered by the AICD, showing there were "only six women CEOs” in the top 200 companies and "only five female chairs” of company boards. So what’s the problem Mr Lee and Ms Kelly? Do you think large numbers of Australians actually care whether the ratio of male to female CEOs is high or low? In teaching and nursing it seems to be the opposite.

Maybe such statistics just show that a lot of women don’t want to be CEOs or “female chairs”. Maybe, Mr Lee and Ms Kelly (who openly shared Mr Lee's concerns), those statistics just reflect reality? Should we have a problem with reality? That indeed seems to be the case. Was it Karl Rove, the Republican Party spin doctor extraordinaire, who said his role was to create reality? Or are we witnessing game theory, a particularly smart but diabolical form of social engineering practiced by the Rand Corporation?

Meanwhile Mr Lee, in an act of Marxist self-criticism, offered more compensation for the guilt of the damning statistics uncovered by his institute. Yes Commissar, the “global diversity” agenda was now being enforced by his friends in the ASX Corporate Governance Council. They intend to bring in a “requirement” that companies “report on diversity in their policies and move towards having measurable targets”.

The on-air encounter between Mr Lee and Ms Kelly raised visions of an old-style, middle rank Soviet bureaucrat groveling before a chief commissar. Keen to please the Commissar, Mr Lee went on to offer that he and his fellow corporate bureaucrats had started “a mentoring program for our women members”. Commissar seemed somewhat pleased. And yes, enforced diversity was also supported by Mr Lee's friends in the Business Council of Australia, who not only follow gender diversity but biodiversity too - as proven by their for a “price on carbon” – or should that read global environmental tax.

But the groveling self-criticism didn't stop there. Mr Lee further volunteered before "Commissar Kelly" that all company board agendas would now have diversity as “action items”! Yes, women board members and CEOs were hard to find! As such, boards would even look to “non-traditional” sources for women members. Might one now presume that Mr Lee will now be actively seeking out lesbians of ethnic minority status to fill CEO seats? Would that finally fulfill the politically correct ideology in the new global Marxist world of business? Perhaps ex-environment come Finance Minister Penny Wong, the AICD's next guest speaker, will fit the bill?

But will there be no apologies from Mr Lee and the ASX for pushing aside and discriminating against more qualified males in order to hire women to fill the “diversity quotas”. Self-contradiction and double-think at work again shaping the totalitarian agenda.

What is it that prevents otherwise well educated people like Rick Lee, Fran Kelly, ASX, AICD and Business Council of Australia members from understanding that enforced “gender equality and diversity” is essentially a totalitarian, social engineering program? None of them, unlike the fiery former chief of Western Mining, Hugh Morgan, appear to have the courage to question the philosophical pedigree of "gender diversity", "biodiversity" and the like. One has to wonder what benefits companies like Newcrest Mining will reap from that handmaiden of feminism, environmentalism. UN Agenda 21 is a chilling example of how these ideologies are being prepared for global adoption. Do they seriously really believe that "diversity/biodiversity" and trading carbon futures will save the planet?

Again, did it occur to Mr Lee and Ms Kelly that perhaps a lot of women simply don’t aspire to be CEOs or managers? Might it be social reality that most women prefer the job of running households and raising children – probably the most important (and most underpaid) job in the world?

While no sane Australian political or corporate leader would admit to hating motherhood and family life, the ideology of Marxist feminism does in fact denigrate such values. The feminists insist that the state is the ultimate nurturer and owner of children. The corporate sector has proven it is only too keen to fill this role on behalf of government and according to its strict regulations.

The environmental side of this "new order" is revealed by the antics of another corporate bureaucrat who has apparently sold out to the global socialist agenda – Marius Kloppers, CEO of BHP Billiton, who recently called for a “price on carbon”.

It seems KloppersKloppers just wants to assuage his guilt for being involved in the coal industry? After all, a price on carbon means BHP Billiton can flog its carbon credits to the likes of Goldman Sachs and their futures market based on air. Pity about the plummeting price of carbon - perhaps reality is finally sinking in.

It must now be asked, is there a lone voice of dissent among the high-powered members of the Australian Institute of Company Directors? (see below) We wait with bated breath, but we won't wait too long.

http://www.company directors.com.au/Representation/Committees/Chairmans+Forum.htm
Mr Don Argus AO FAICD
Ms Elizabeth Bryan FAICD Chairman, Caltex Australia Limited
Mr Michael Chaney AO FAICD Chairman, National Australia Bank Limited / Woodside Petroleum Limited
Mr John Colvin FAICD CEO and MD, Australian Institute of Company Directors
Mr David Crawford FAICD Chairman, Foster's Group Ltd / Lend Lease Corporation Limited
Mr Ted Evans AC Chairman, Westpac Banking Corporation Limited
Mr David Gonski AC FAICD Chairman, ASX Limited / Coca-Cola Amatil Limited
Mr Mark Johnson Chairman, AGL Energy Limited
Mr Rick Lee FAICD Chairman, Salmat Limited / Australian Institute of Company Directors
Ms Catherine Livingstone AO Chairman, Telstra Corporation Limited
Mr Peter Mason AM FAICD Chairman, AMP Limited
Mr John Morschel FAICD Chairman, Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
Dr John Schubert FAICD Non-executive director of BHP Billiton Limited and QANTAS Airways Limited
Mr John Story FAICD Chairman, Suncorp-Metway Limited / Tabcorp Holdings Limited
Mr James Strong AO FAICD Chairman, Insurance Australia Group Limited / Woolworths Limited